Hyundai Coupe 2003 vs Toyota Celica 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Hyundai Coupe and Toyota Celica have the same engine power, but Hyundai Coupe torque is 16 NM more than Toyota Celica. Hyundai Coupe reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Coupe consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Coupe could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Coupe consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 400'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Coupe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Coupe might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Coupe 2003 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Coupe 2003 2.0 engine Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.33 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Coupe is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Coupe is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Coupe is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Hyundai Coupe can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Coupe has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |