Hyundai Coupe 2001 vs Toyota Celica 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Coupe engine produces 38 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Coupe reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Coupe consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Hyundai Coupe over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Coupe consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Coupe might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Coupe engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.33 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Coupe is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Coupe is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Coupe has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |