Hyundai Coupe 1998 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Hyundai Coupe) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Chevrolet Captiva) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 132 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Hyundai Coupe engine produces 18 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 154 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Lantra | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Captiva might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Hyundai Coupe is smaller. Hyundai Coupe is 30 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Coupe is 41 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
360 litres | 930 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 570 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`600 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`240 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 360 kg | 715 kg | |
| Hyundai Coupe load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is almost two times less than Chevrolet Captiva. Therefore, Chevrolet Captiva is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Coupe has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |