Hyundai Atos 1997 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 82 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Hyundai Atos engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Atos reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Atos consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Atos could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Atos consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Hyundai Atos is smaller, but higher. Hyundai Atos is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Atos is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1064 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Atos has 8 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Atos (by 29 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Atos is 1.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Hyundai Atos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`220 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Atos has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Atos has
|
Renault Clio has
| |