Hyundai Atos 2005 vs Suzuki Swift 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 63 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Atos engine produces 29 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Atos reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Atos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Atos consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Hyundai Atos over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Atos consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 550 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Getz | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.52 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Hyundai Atos is smaller, but slightly higher. Hyundai Atos is 14 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Atos is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 198 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 562 litres | |
|
Hyundai Atos has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Atos has 22 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The Suzuki Swift may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Atos is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Hyundai Atos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Hyundai Atos has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Hyundai Atos quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Atos has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |