Hyundai Atos 2005 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 63 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Atos engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, but torque is 4 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Atos reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Atos consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Atos could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Atos consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 550 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Atos engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Getz | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.52 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.46 m | |
| Hyundai Atos is 15 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Atos is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 751 litres | |
|
Hyundai Atos has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Atos has 81 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Atos is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Hyundai Atos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Atos has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Atos has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |