Hyundai Atos 1997 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 55 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 82 NM | 106 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
|
Hyundai Atos petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Hyundai Atos is smaller, but higher. Hyundai Atos is 40 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Atos is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1064 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Hyundai Atos has 7 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Atos (by 34 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Atos is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Hyundai Atos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`220 | ~ 1`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Atos has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |