Hyundai Atos 2002 vs Suzuki Alto 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 84 NM | 73 - 77 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 - 19.8 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 6.8 | 5.4 - 7.2 | |
|
Hyundai Atos petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Alto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.40 m | |
| Hyundai Atos and Suzuki Alto are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1084 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 8.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Atos is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Hyundai Atos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`316 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |