Hyundai Atos 2002 vs Hyundai Atos 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 63 HP | |
| Torque: | 84 NM | 97 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 - 19.8 seconds | 15.2 - 18.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 6.8 | 5.5 - 6.1 | |
|
Hyundai Atos 2002 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Atos 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Atos 2002 is 6 cm shorter than the Hyundai Atos 2005, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Atos 2002 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 263 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1084 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Atos 2002 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Hyundai Atos 2005 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`316 kg | ~ 1`400 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Atos has
|
Hyundai Atos has
| |