Honda Stream 2001 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is more dynamic to drive. Honda Stream engine produces 6 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Honda Stream reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Stream is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Stream consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda Stream over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Stream consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Honda Stream is smaller. Honda Stream is 7 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Stream is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 158 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 158 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | 952 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Stream (by 568 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Stream is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Honda Stream can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Stream has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |