Honda Stream 2001 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is more dynamic to drive. Honda Stream engine produces 6 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 18 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Honda Stream reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Stream is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Stream consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Honda Stream over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Stream consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Sharan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Sharan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine Volkswagen Sharan 2000 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Honda Stream is smaller. Honda Stream is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Stream is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 158 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 158 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Stream is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Stream has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |