Honda Stream 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is more dynamic to drive. Honda Stream engine produces 20 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Thanks to more power Honda Stream reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.2 | |
|
The Honda Stream is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Stream consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Honda Stream over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Honda Stream is smaller. Honda Stream is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Stream is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 158 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 158 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | 1930 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Mitsubishi Space Wagon has more luggage space (by 82 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Stream has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |