Honda Stream 2001 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is more dynamic to drive. Honda Stream engine produces 6 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Honda Stream reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Stream is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Stream consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda Stream over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Stream consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Honda Stream is smaller. Honda Stream is 7 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Stream is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 158 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 158 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | 952 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Stream (by 568 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Stream is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Honda Stream can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Stream has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |