Honda Stream 2001 vs Mazda MPV 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is more dynamic to drive. Honda Stream engine produces 34 HP more power than Mazda MPV, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Mazda MPV. Thanks to more power Honda Stream reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.1 | |
|
The Honda Stream is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Stream consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that by driving the Honda Stream over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MPV engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Stream might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Honda Stream is smaller. Honda Stream is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda MPV, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Stream is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 158 litres | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 158 litres | 294 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1520 litres | 1600 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Mazda MPV has more luggage space (by 136 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda MPV (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Stream is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda MPV, which means Honda Stream can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`030 kg | 2`230 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`475 kg | 1`600 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 555 kg | 630 kg | |
| Honda Stream load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Mazda MPV. Therefore, Mazda MPV is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Stream has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |