Honda Stream 2001 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.7 - 2.0 (petrol) | 2.4 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 - 158 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
Torque: | 154 - 192 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 11.2 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.1 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
Honda Stream petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.91 m | |
Height: | 1.59 m | 1.77 m | |
Honda Stream is smaller. Honda Stream is 24 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Stream is 18 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 158 litres | 249 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | 1837 litres | |
Volvo XC90 has more luggage space. Honda Stream has 91 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 317 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Stream is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Honda Stream can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`974 | ~ 2`735 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Stream has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |