Honda Stream 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.7 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 158 HP | 136 - 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 192 NM | 178 - 299 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 11.2 seconds | 10.7 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.1 | 9.2 - 11.2 | |
|
Honda Stream petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda Stream is smaller. Honda Stream is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Stream is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 158 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | 1930 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has more luggage space. Honda Stream has 82 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`974 | ~ 2`170 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Stream has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |