Honda Saber 2001 vs Jaguar XJ 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Honda Saber engine produces 20 HP more power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Jaguar XJ. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 85 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Saber) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Honda Saber is smaller. Honda Saber is 23 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Saber is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Saber has
|
| |