Honda Saber 1995 vs Opel Omega 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 237 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Honda Saber engine produces 20 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Opel Omega. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 9.1 | |
|
The Honda Saber is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Saber consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Honda Saber over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Saber) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.46 m | |
| Honda Saber is 5 cm longer than the Opel Omega, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Saber is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda Saber has 130 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. This could mean that the Honda Saber uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`380 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Saber has
|
Opel Omega has
| |