Honda Saber 1995 vs Alfa Romeo 164 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 237 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Honda Saber engine produces 6 HP more power than Alfa Romeo 164, but torque is 18 NM less than Alfa Romeo 164. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 10.7 | |
|
The Honda Saber is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Saber consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 164, which means that by driving the Honda Saber over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Honda Saber gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Honda Saber is larger. Honda Saber is 28 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 164, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda Saber is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 504 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda Saber has 104 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 164. This could mean that the Honda Saber uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`380 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Saber has
|
Alfa Romeo 164 has
| |