Honda Saber 1995 vs Volvo 960 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Honda Saber engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo 960, but torque is 7 NM less than Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Saber) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo 960) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Saber is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda Saber is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 491 litres | |
|
Volvo 960 has more luggage space. Honda Saber has 91 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Saber has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |