Honda Saber 1995 vs Ford Scorpio 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Honda Saber engine produces 24 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Ford Scorpio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Saber) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.39 m | |
| Honda Saber is 2 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Saber is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Saber has
|
| |