Honda Saber 1995 vs Volvo S90 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda Saber is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo S90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Honda Saber is available with front wheel drive, while Volvo S90 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 - 190 HP | 180 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 - 237 NM | 260 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 11.0 - 11.7 | |
|
Honda Saber petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Saber is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda Saber is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`380 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Saber has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |