Honda Saber 1995 vs Alfa Romeo 164 1987
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Honda Saber is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Alfa Romeo 164 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Honda Saber is available only with front wheel drive, while Alfa Romeo 164 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 - 190 HP | 125 - 228 HP | |
Torque: | 186 - 237 NM | 187 - 294 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.5 - 10.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.8 - 11.0 | |
Honda Saber petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 164. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.39 m | |
Honda Saber is larger. Honda Saber is 26 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 164, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda Saber is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 505 litres | |
Alfa Romeo 164 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda Saber has 105 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 164. This could mean that the Honda Saber uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`380 | ~ 2`046 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Saber has
|
Alfa Romeo 164 has
| |