Honda S2000 1999 vs BMW Z3 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Honda S2000 is more dynamic to drive. Honda S2000 engine produces 90 HP more power than BMW Z3, whereas torque is 18 NM more than BMW Z3. Thanks to more power Honda S2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda S2000 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda S2000 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda S2000 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 490 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW Z3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW Z3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW Z3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Honda S2000 is larger, but slightly lower. Honda S2000 is 9 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda S2000 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 165 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda S2000 is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW Z3, which means Honda S2000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`220 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda S2000 has
|
BMW Z3 has
| |