Honda S2000 2004 vs Mercedes SLK 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda S2000 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mercedes SLK has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.8 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 163 - 360 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 240 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.7 - 12.0 | |
|
On average, the Honda S2000 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mercedes SLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.30 m | |
| Honda S2000 is 5 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda S2000 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 143 litres | 208 litres | |
|
Mercedes SLK has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda S2000 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. This could mean that the Honda S2000 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda S2000 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`220 | ~ 1`761 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda S2000 has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |