Honda S2000 2004 vs BMW Z4 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda S2000 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas BMW Z4 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 - 343 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 200 - 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 5 - 8.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.5 - 12.2 | |
|
Honda S2000 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda S2000 is 5 cm longer than the BMW Z4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda S2000 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 143 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 260 litres | |
|
BMW Z4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda S2000 has 97 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z4. This could mean that the Honda S2000 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda S2000 is 1 metres more than that of the BMW Z4, which means Honda S2000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`220 | ~ 1`604 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda S2000 has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |