Honda S2000 1999 vs Toyota Sienna 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Honda S2000 is available with rear wheel drive, while Toyota Sienna can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 197 - 213 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 284 - 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 9.4 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.5 - 9.6 | |
|
Honda S2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Sienna. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Honda S2000 is smaller. Honda S2000 is 78 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Honda S2000 is 43 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`220 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |