Honda S2000 1999 vs BMW Z3 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda S2000 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas BMW Z3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.8 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 115 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 168 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 6 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.8 - 10.6 | |
|
Honda S2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW Z3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Honda S2000 is larger, but slightly lower. Honda S2000 is 10 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda S2000 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 165 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda S2000 is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW Z3, which means Honda S2000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`220 | ~ 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda S2000 has
|
BMW Z3 has
| |