Honda Prelude 1993 vs Toyota Celica 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 212 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Prelude is more dynamic to drive. Honda Prelude engine produces 29 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 26 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Honda Prelude reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Prelude consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Prelude could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Prelude consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Honda Prelude is larger, but slightly lower. Honda Prelude is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 6 cm wider, while the height of Honda Prelude is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Prelude is 1.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Honda Prelude can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |