Honda Prelude 1992 vs Toyota Celica 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Honda Prelude engine produces 23 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Honda Prelude reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.8 | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Prelude consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Prelude could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Honda Prelude is larger, but slightly lower. Honda Prelude is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 6 cm wider, while the height of Honda Prelude is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |