Honda Prelude 1992 vs Honda Prelude 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 133 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 179 NM | 179 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Honda Prelude 1992 and Honda Prelude 1996 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
The Honda Prelude 1992 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Prelude 1992 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude 1996, which means that by driving the Honda Prelude 1992 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Prelude 1992 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude 1996. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
680 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Honda Prelude 1992 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.54 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.29 m | 1.32 m | |
Honda Prelude 1992 is 10 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude 1996, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda Prelude 1992 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |