Honda Prelude 1997 vs Ford Probe 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Honda Prelude engine produces 67 HP more power than Ford Probe, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Ford Probe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Probe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Prelude consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Prelude could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Prelude consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 550 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Probe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.31 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Prelude is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Probe, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Prelude is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Prelude is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Probe. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
Ford Probe has
| |