Honda Prelude 1996 vs Toyota Yaris 2007
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Honda Prelude is more dynamic to drive. Honda Prelude engine produces 52 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Thanks to more power Honda Prelude reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Prelude consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Prelude could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Prelude consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Prelude gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Prelude engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine: This engine is generally considered decent, with a lifespan of around 250,000 km. While it doesn’t cause major issues if properly maintained, some common problems still arise.
One of the most frequent ... More about Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Honda Prelude is larger, but lower. Honda Prelude is 74 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 5 cm wider, while the height of Honda Prelude is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Prelude is 1.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Honda Prelude can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |