Honda Prelude 1996 vs Ford Probe 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Honda Prelude engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford Probe, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Ford Probe. Despite the higher power, Honda Prelude reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.8 | |
|
The Ford Probe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Prelude consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Prelude could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Probe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.31 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Prelude is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Probe, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Prelude is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Prelude is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Probe. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
Ford Probe has
| |