Honda Prelude 1996 vs Ford Probe 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda Prelude is more dynamic to drive. Honda Prelude engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford Probe, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Ford Probe. Thanks to more power Honda Prelude reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Probe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Prelude consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Prelude could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Prelude consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Probe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.31 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Prelude is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Probe, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Prelude is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Prelude is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Probe. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
Ford Probe has
| |