Honda Prelude 1996 vs Honda Prelude 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 133 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 179 NM | 179 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Honda Prelude 1996 and Honda Prelude 1992 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
The Honda Prelude 1992 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Prelude 1996 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude 1992, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Prelude 1996 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Prelude 1996 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude 1992. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
660 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Honda Prelude 1992 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.54 m | 4.44 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.29 m | |
Honda Prelude 1996 is 10 cm longer than the Honda Prelude 1992, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Prelude 1996 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |