Honda Prelude 1996 vs Ford Puma 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Honda Prelude engine produces 8 HP more power than Ford Puma, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Ford Puma. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Prelude consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Prelude could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Prelude consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Prelude gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Prelude engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 4 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Prelude might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Honda Prelude is larger, but slightly lower. Honda Prelude is 56 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 8 cm wider, while the height of Honda Prelude is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Prelude is 1 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Honda Prelude can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
Ford Puma has
| |