Honda Prelude 1996 vs Chrysler Sebring 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Honda Prelude engine produces 70 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 99 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Honda Prelude reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Prelude is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Prelude consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Honda Prelude over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Prelude consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Prelude gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Honda Prelude is smaller. Honda Prelude is 29 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Prelude is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Prelude has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |