Honda Prelude 1996 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Honda Prelude is available with front wheel drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 - 200 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 - 211 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 10.8 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 10.4 | 8.8 - 9.3 | |
|
Honda Prelude petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Prelude is 2 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda Prelude is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 307 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Prelude is 1.4 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Honda Prelude can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |