Honda Jazz 2002 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Honda Jazz engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Jazz is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1323 litres | 760 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 225 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 563 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`470 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |