Honda Jazz 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 78 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is more dynamic to drive. Honda Jazz engine produces 3 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
| By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Jazz is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1323 litres | 760 litres | |
| Honda Jazz has 120 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 563 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`455 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |