Honda Jazz 2004 vs Volkswagen Polo 1997
Body: | Hatchback | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Power: | 83 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 119 NM | 128 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Honda Jazz engine produces 17 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
By specification Honda Jazz consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Length: | 3.84 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
Honda Jazz is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda Jazz is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 800 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | high | |
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 480 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
|
|