Honda Jazz 2004 vs Volkswagen Polo 1997

Honda Jazz
2004 - 2007
Volkswagen Polo
1997 - 1999
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Body: HatchbackHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Power: 83 HP100 HP
Torque: 119 NM128 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds10.5 seconds
Honda Jazz engine produces 17 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later.
Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.76.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km7.6 l/100km
By specification Honda Jazz consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway830 km on highway
650 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Length: 3.84 m3.72 m
Width: 1.68 m1.66 m
Height: 1.52 m1.42 m
Honda Jazz is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda Jazz is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`000800

According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 480 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 2000800
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Contact us: [email protected]