Honda Jazz 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda Jazz) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Colt) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Honda Jazz engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 91 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.4 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Jazz consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Jazz could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Jazz is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1323 litres | 760 litres | |
| Honda Jazz has 120 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 563 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`470 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda Jazz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Colt, so Honda Jazz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |