Honda Jazz 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Honda Jazz engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Jazz is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1323 litres | 760 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 225 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 563 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`470 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Jazz, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |