Honda Jazz 2004 vs Honda Civic 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 83 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 119 NM | 130 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
Honda Jazz engine produces 7 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Honda Civic. Despite less power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.2 | |
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Jazz consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.84 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
Honda Jazz is smaller, but slightly higher. Honda Jazz is 44 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Jazz is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1323 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`470 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Honda Civic has
| |