Honda Jazz 2008 vs Toyota Auris 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Auris is a more dynamic driving. Honda Jazz engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Toyota Auris. Due to the lower power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Jazz engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Auris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Auris 2009 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Auris 2009 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Honda Jazz is smaller, but slightly higher. Honda Jazz is 32 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 428 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1396 litres | 750 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 78 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Auris. The Toyota Auris may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 646 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Auris has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |