Honda Jazz 2008 vs Nissan Note 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Note is a more dynamic driving. Honda Jazz engine produces 11 HP more power than Nissan Note, but torque is 1 NM less than Nissan Note. Despite the higher power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Jazz engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Nissan Cube | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.55 m | |
| Honda Jazz is 20 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Jazz is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 428 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1396 litres | 1332 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 148 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. The Nissan Note may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 64 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.9 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Honda Jazz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`546 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Nissan Note has
| |