Honda Jazz 2008 vs Mazda 2 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is more dynamic to drive. Honda Jazz engine produces 13 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Jazz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 2 2008 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.48 m | |
| Honda Jazz and Mazda 2 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 428 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1396 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Honda Jazz has 178 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 2 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |