Honda Jazz 2008 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Honda Jazz engine produces 3 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Honda Jazz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 2 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Jazz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.48 m | |
| Honda Jazz is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Jazz is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 428 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1396 litres | 787 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 178 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 609 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`490 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 2 scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 2 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |