Honda Jazz 2008 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is more dynamic to drive. Honda Jazz engine produces 24 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Honda Jazz reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Jazz consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Jazz could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Jazz consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Jazz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda Jazz 2008 1.3 engine: The Honda L13A is a small 1.3-liter engine with an i-VTEC 16-valve design, known for its exceptional durability. It uses a timing chain and is widely regarded as one of the most reliable engines in its class. With proper maintenance, it ... More about Honda Jazz 2008 1.3 engine Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.48 m | |
| Honda Jazz is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Jazz is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 428 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1396 litres | 787 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Jazz has 178 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 609 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Jazz is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 2 scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 2 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Jazz has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |